ClaimThe Bible and the translationverified1960sExplicit statement

Die Bibel und die Übersetzung · Claim record

Bruce Metzger kam im Juli 1964 in einer namentlich gezeichneten Rezension der Neuen-Welt-Übersetzung der Christlichen Griechischen Schriften in The Bible Translator, der Zeitschrift des Weltbunds der Bibelgesellschaften, auf das Thema zurück. Die Rezension fällt gemischt aus. Er räumte ein, 'on the whole, one gains a tolerably good impression of the scholarly equipment of the translators (their names are not divulged)', und 'frequently an intelligent use of critical information is apparent'; anschließend schrieb er, 'the introduction of the word “Jehovah” into the New Testament text, in spite of much ingenuity in an argument filled with a considerable amount of irrelevant material, is a plain piece of special pleading', und wiederholte seine Einwände von 1953 gegen 'and the Word was a god' in Johannes 1:1 und gegen das viermalige 'other' in Kolosser 1:16.

Claim ID claim-bible-metzger-1964-review-existsConcerns Juli 1964Ausdrückliche Aussage

Die Aussage und ihre Belege

Ausdrückliche Aussage · Juli 1964 Geprüft

Bruce Metzger kam im Juli 1964 in einer namentlich gezeichneten Rezension der Neuen-Welt-Übersetzung der Christlichen Griechischen Schriften in The Bible Translator, der Zeitschrift des Weltbunds der Bibelgesellschaften, auf das Thema zurück. Die Rezension fällt gemischt aus. Er räumte ein, 'on the whole, one gains a tolerably good impression of the scholarly equipment of the translators (their names are not divulged)', und 'frequently an intelligent use of critical information is apparent'; anschließend schrieb er, 'the introduction of the word “Jehovah” into the New Testament text, in spite of much ingenuity in an argument filled with a considerable amount of irrelevant material, is a plain piece of special pleading', und wiederholte seine Einwände von 1953 gegen 'and the Word was a god' in Johannes 1:1 und gegen das viermalige 'other' in Kolosser 1:16. Source: The Bible Translator, Juli 1964

Die Position der Organisation oder ihre spätere Erklärung: Anhang A5 der Neuen-Welt-Übersetzung von 2013 ist die Antwort der Organisation zum göttlichen Namen. Metzgers eigene Rezension hält unabhängig davon dieselbe Zahl fest, die auch die Organisation angibt: Der Name werde '237 times into the main body of the text, as well as 72 times in the footnotes' eingefügt.

Belege anzeigen (1 Quelle)
Von Fachleuten begutachtet / wissenschaftlich Geprüft

The Bible Translator, “Book Review: New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures”

Juli 1964 · pp.150-152 (quoted passages at pp. 151 and 152) · Bruce M. Metzger · United Bible Societies (published by SAGE; DOI 10.1177/000608446401500311)

“On the whole, one gains a tolerably good impression of the scholarly equipment of the translators (their names are not divulged). … Frequently an intelligent use of critical information is apparent. (p. 151) … Some of the translations which are simply indefensible include the following. The introduction of the word 'Jehovah' into the New Testament text, in spite of much ingenuity in an argument filled with a considerable amount of irrelevant material (pp. 10-25), is a plain piece of special pleading. (p. 152)”

A signed review of the 1950 New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures in the United Bible Societies' translation journal, running from the heading 'BOOK REVIEW' on p. 150 to the signature 'BRUCE M. METZGER' at the foot of p. 152. It is mixed, not uniformly hostile. Metzger notes the Westcott and Hort Greek text, records that 'one of the most notable features of the translation is the introduction of the name Jehovah 237 times into the main body of the text, as well as 72 times in the footnotes in the lower margin' (p. 151), and allows the translators 'a tolerably good impression of the scholarly equipment'. He then objects that rendering the same Greek word by the same English word 'has a specious show of faithfulness to the original, but the application of the principle with any degree of consistency tends to produce a certain woodenness' (p. 151); that 'and the Word was a god' at John 1:1, 'while entirely in accord with the Arian theology of the sect, is not justified despite a lengthy note which attempts to support it' (p. 152); and that 'in the interest of providing support for their Unitarianism, the translators have not hesitated to insert four times the word “other” (totally without warrant from the Greek) before the word “things” in Col. 1: 16 f.' (p. 152).

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung for The Bible Translator, Book Review: New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. Opened and read in full on 19 September 2026 — all three printed pages. journals.sagepub.com still returns HTTP 403 to automated requests and the live ubs-translations.org page now returns HTTP 404, but the Wayback Machine serves the United Bible Societies' own page images of the issue: a150.jpg, a151.jpg and a152.jpg under /tbt/1964/03/. Those three images were downloaded and read, and the quotations above are transcribed from them. The review is signed 'BRUCE M. METZGER'. Crossref independently confirms The Bible Translator vol. 15 no. 3 (July 1964), pp. 150-152, by B. Metzger.

Herkunft des Scans. Page images of the printed journal from the United Bible Societies' own Bible Translator archive at ubs-translations.org, preserved in the Wayback Machine. The review occupies the images a150.jpg, a151.jpg and a152.jpg in /tbt/1964/03/, whose printed page numbers are 150, 151 and 152; the viewer's own index maps image a151.jpg to printed page 151, which is the page the secondary literature cites. The live ubs-translations.org page now returns HTTP 404.

Notes. This record previously said the text could not be opened and that nothing should be quoted from it. [Independent audit, 19 September 2026] It has now been read, and that judgement is reversed. The much-circulated sentence about 'a plain piece of special pleading' is accurate word for word, and it is on p. 152. The citation 'pp. 150-153' that circulates online is wrong: the review ends on p. 152. Note two traps. First, the same three pages contain the favourable sentence that defenders of the translation quote, so a page that uses one half without the other is quoting selectively. Second, Wikipedia's rendering of the p. 151 sentence, 'Frequently an intelligent use of a critical information is apparent', has a stray 'a'; the printed text reads 'an intelligent use of critical information'.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-nwt-metzger-1964-bible-translator

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/de/evidence/claim-bible-metzger-1964-review-exists/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.