ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified2010sExplicit statement

Chronologie und 607 v. u. Z. · Claim record

Der Wachtturm vom 1. November 2011 hält in einer Fußnote fest, dass keiner der von ihm zitierten weltlichen Fachleute der Ansicht ist, Jerusalem sei 607 v. u. Z. zerstört worden.

Claim ID claim-chronology-no-expert-holds-607Concerns 1. November 2011Ausdrückliche Aussage

Die Aussage und ihre Belege

Ausdrückliche Aussage · 1. November 2011 Geprüft

Der Wachtturm vom 1. November 2011 hält in einer Fußnote fest, dass keiner der von ihm zitierten weltlichen Fachleute der Ansicht ist, Jerusalem sei 607 v. u. Z. zerstört worden. Source: The Watchtower, 1. November 2011Source: The Watchtower, 1. November 2011

Die Position der Organisation oder ihre spätere Erklärung: Der Artikel schließt dennoch, es gebe für seine Lesart „auch außerbiblische Anhaltspunkte“, womit die von ihm erörterten astronomischen Daten gemeint sind und nicht die von ihm zitierten Gelehrten.

Belege anzeigen (2 Quellen)
Primärveröffentlichung von Jehovas Zeugen Geprüft

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two”

1. November 2011 · p.23 · footnote c · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Note: None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.”

A footnote attached to the paragraph quoting R. H. Sack on the Babylonian chronicles. It applies to every scholar cited in the article, including Sack, Steele, Brown, van der Spek, Sachs and Hunger.

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation was confirmed word for word against the article text.The Watchtower Online Library prints the footnote block at the end of the document, after the last page marker, so the page recorded here is the page carrying the footnote's reference marker in the body text, read from the page marker immediately before it.

Untermauert durch. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-why-trust-bible

Notes. Printed by the organisation itself. Any statement that the organisation conceals the absence of scholarly support for 607 BCE is wrong; the concession is in the article.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-ftn-c

Primärveröffentlichung von Jehovas Zeugen Geprüft

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two”

1. November 2011 · p.27 · pars. 35-36 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“At present, the majority of secular historians believe that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 B.C.E. However, the Bible writers Jeremiah and Daniel clearly state that the Jews were in exile for 70 years, not 50 years. (Jeremiah 25:1, 2, 11; 29:10; Daniel 9:2) Those statements strongly indicate that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E. As the above evidence shows, that conclusion has some secular support.”

The closing section, headed “Why Trust the Bible?”, continues: “Secular experts have repeatedly questioned the Bible’s accuracy. Yet, when more evidence is uncovered, the Bible record has time and again been vindicated.”

Hinweis zu Herkunft und Überprüfung for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two

Hinweis zur Vertrauensangabe. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation, the paragraph and the page were confirmed against the article text and its embedded page markers (span class=“pageNum”).

Notes. The organisation’s own summary of its case, and its best counter-argument, in its own words.

Abgerufen. 19. September 2026 · Quellenkennung. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-why-trust-bible

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/de/evidence/claim-chronology-no-expert-holds-607/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.