ClaimAuthority and accountabilitydisputed1910sContext

Autorité et obligation de rendre des comptes · Claim record

Le récit largement diffusé selon lequel Russell aurait affirmé sous serment connaître le grec puis n’aurait pas su lire l’alphabet grec nous parvient par la brochure de Ross lui-même, où il est raconté avec des bribes de dialogue citées plutôt que transcrit. La version ordonnée, sous forme de questions et de réponses, qui circule en ligne ne figure dans aucun des deux tirages de la brochure examinés — dans l’un comme dans l’autre, le seul endroit où apparaissent les mots “alphabet” ou “447” est le récit de Ross — et aucun compte rendu judiciaire ni article de presse de l’époque relatant cet échange n’a été localisé.

Claim ID claim-authority-greek-alphabet-transcript-statusConcerns 1913Contexte

L’affirmation et ses preuves

Contexte · 1913 Contesté

Le récit largement diffusé selon lequel Russell aurait affirmé sous serment connaître le grec puis n’aurait pas su lire l’alphabet grec nous parvient par la brochure de Ross lui-même, où il est raconté avec des bribes de dialogue citées plutôt que transcrit. La version ordonnée, sous forme de questions et de réponses, qui circule en ligne ne figure dans aucun des deux tirages de la brochure examinés — dans l’un comme dans l’autre, le seul endroit où apparaissent les mots “alphabet” ou “447” est le récit de Ross — et aucun compte rendu judiciaire ni article de presse de l’époque relatant cet échange n’a été localisé. Source: Some Facts and More Facts About the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell (of Millennial Dawn Fame), 1913Source: The Watchtower, 15 mai 1953

Position de l’organisation ou explication ultérieure : La Tour de Garde du 15 mai 1953 dit que l’accusation “was not made in court, but in a tract written later”, que “the question they ‘quote’ [has] been reworded”, et que Russell avait de toute façon dit qu’il ne connaissait pas le grec.

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Source de repérage uniquement Étayé

Some Facts and More Facts About the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell (of Millennial Dawn Fame), “Pamphlet, sub-titled ‘The history of the Libel Case: “Pastor” Russell before the Courts’”

1913 · pp.18-19 · Rev. J. J. Ross · Book Department, Philadelphia School of the Bible

““Do you know the Greek”? Asked the Attorney. “Oh, yes,” was Russell’s reply. Here he was handed a copy of the New Testament in Greek, by Westcott & Hort, and asked to read the letters of the alphabet as they appear on the top of page 447. He did not know the alphabet. “Now,” asked Mr. Staunton, “Are you familiar with the Greek language?” “No,” said Mr. Russell, without a blush.”

Ross, a Baptist minister in Hamilton, Ontario, was prosecuted by Russell for defamatory libel over a leaflet Ross had published in June 1912. This pamphlet is Ross’s own account of the proceedings, published after they ended, and the passage above is his narrative of the examination of 17 March 1913 with snatches of dialogue quoted inside it — not a transcript. Elsewhere in the same pamphlet Ross does print question-and-answer material, which he says he holds as certified transcripts.

Note de provenance et de vérification for Some Facts and More Facts About the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell (of Millennial Dawn Fame), Pamphlet, sub-titled ‘The history of the Libel Case: “Pastor” Russell before the Courts’

Note sur la fiabilité. Both separately digitised printings were opened and the passage read; the wording is the same in each, so it is not an artefact of one scan. In both printings this is the only place in the pamphlet where the words “alphabet” or “447” occur, and the tidy question-and-answer version that circulates online appears in neither. What cannot be confirmed is the content: this is the defendant in Russell’s own prosecution writing about his own case, and no court record, official transcript or contemporary newspaper report of the Hamilton examination was located. It is not the court record, and it is not evidence of what was said in court.

Provenance de la numérisation. Two separately digitised printings were opened: the “Forty-sixth Thousand” (Philadelphia School of the Bible) at archive.org/details/SomeFactsAndMoreFactsAboutCharlesTazeRussell, and the “Thirteenth Thousand” (North-West Bible and Tract Depot, Winnipeg) filmed by the Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions at archive.org/details/cihm_87677.

Notes. The same pamphlet reproduces, in question-and-answer form, passages of Maria Russell’s sworn direct examination in the Pennsylvania Common Pleas trial, which Ross says he holds as a transcript certified by the official court reporter Alexander Callow. Ross also records that “the jury found absolutely no ground for libel and handed down the verdict ‘no bill’” (page 15), and, writing on 26 May 1913, that this was “on the 1st ult.”, that is 1 April 1913. The pamphlet’s reliability is limited on its face: the leaflet of June 1912 that it reprints states that Russell’s wife “divorced him a few years ago on the ground of cruelty and of having wrong relations with other women” and that “In court, she proved improprieties between her husband and one Rose Ball” — both of which the record in this ledger contradicts.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-ctr-ross-1913-some-facts-more-facts

Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”

15 mai 1953 · p.319 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“The “perjury” charge was not made in court, but in a tract written later by an irresponsible slanderer against whom Brother Russell had brought a libel case. The official record of the case in question (Police Court of the City of Hamilton, Ontario, March 17, 1913) says: “Q. You don't profess, then, to be schooled in the Latin language? A. No, sir. Q. Or in Greek? A. No, sir.” After this he was asked if he knew individual Greek letters, and it was over this that the question of his knowledge of Greek arose. ... Not only has the question they “quote” been reworded, but Brother Russell had specifically said that he did not know Greek.”

A reader asked whether tract charges that the Society's first president was immoral, profiteered from “miracle wheat” and committed perjury about Greek were true. The article answers “No. They were deliberate falsehoods,” and deals with all three.

Note de provenance et de vérification for The Watchtower, Questions From Readers

Note sur la fiabilité. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026; the page marker in the document is 319 and the citation code printed in the page is w53 5/15. The organisation here quotes a transcript of the Hamilton hearing of 17 March 1913 and concedes that Russell said he was not schooled in Greek; it disputes the wording of the version circulated by critics, not the underlying admission.

Corroboré par. src-ctr-ross-1913-some-facts-more-facts

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-ctr-w-1953-0515-qfr-charges

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-authority-greek-alphabet-transcript-status/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.