JWTruth.orgRessource documentaire comparative
Ask JWTruth Rechercher
Français

Cette page en

En anglais uniquement

Toutes les langues

La chronologie et 607 av. n. è. · Claim record

La deuxième partie soutient que les chroniques babyloniennes ne couvrent qu’environ 35 des quelque 88 années de la période néo-babylonienne et ne peuvent donc établir une chronologie continue.

Claim ID claim-chronology-chronicles-gapsConcerns 1 novembre 2011Explication de l’organisation
Explication de l’organisation · 1 novembre 2011 Vérifié

La deuxième partie soutient que les chroniques babyloniennes ne couvrent qu’environ 35 des quelque 88 années de la période néo-babylonienne et ne peuvent donc établir une chronologie continue. The Watchtower, 1 novembre 2011Insight on the Scriptures, Volume 1, 1988

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two”

1 novembre 2011 · p.23 · pars. 12-15 and box · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“There are gaps in the history recorded in the Babylonian chronicles. … Logically, then, the question arises, How reliable are deductions based on such an incomplete record?”

The accompanying box, “THE BABYLONIAN CHRONICLES—A HISTORY WITH GAPS”, states: “The Babylonian chronicles provide an account for only 35 years of the Neo-Babylonian period, traditionally presumed to span some 88 years.” The text quotes R. H. Sack that historians must probe “secondary sources . . . in the hope of determining what actually happened.”

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation, the paragraph and the page were confirmed against the article text and its embedded page markers (span class=“pageNum”).

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-chronicles

Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

Insight on the Scriptures, Volume 1, “Chronology”

1988 · pp.453-454 · under “Babylonian Chronology” · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“In view of all these factors it is certainly not wise to insist that the traditional figures for the reigns of the Neo-Babylonian kings be received as definite.”

The argument is that the Babylonian Chronicle tablets are later copies — citing D. J. Wiseman that one portion is “a copy made in the twenty-second year of Darius … from an older and damaged text”, and that the Neo-Babylonian Chronicle texts are in a script that “does not of itself allow any precise dating”. The same section notes that “For the final 32 years of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, there are no historical records of the chronicle type except a fragmentary inscription of a campaign against Egypt in Nebuchadnezzar’s 37th year.”

Source officielle

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Full article fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026; the quotation and the page were confirmed against the text and its embedded page markers. Insight on the Scriptures is undated on the Online Library; the 1988 publication year is the work’s own imprint date.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-chr-o-it1-chronology-neo-babylonian

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-chronology-chronicles-gaps/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.