En Conti v Watchtower, un jurado de California concedió en 2012 unos 28 millones de dólares (7 millones en daños compensatorios y 21 millones en daños punitivos, estos últimos reducidos por el juez de primera instancia a 8,61 millones); en 2015, el Tribunal de Apelación confirmó la responsabilidad por no supervisar el servicio del campo de un abusador conocido, pero revocó la indemnización punitiva, al sostener que los ancianos «no tenían el deber de apartarse de la política de confidencialidad de Watchtower y advertir a los miembros de la congregación».

California Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three, “Conti v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc., 235 Cal.App.4th 1214 (No. A136641)”

13 de abril de 2015 · Holdings and disposition · California Courts (opinion text via FindLaw)

“The elders of the Fremont Congregation had no duty to depart from Watchtower's policy of confidentiality and warn the members of the Congregation that Kendrick had molested a child.”

The court reversed the punitive award but held that 'Defendants had a duty to use reasonable care to restrict and supervise Kendrick's field service to prevent him from harming children'. The 2012 Alameda County jury had awarded $7,000,000 compensatory and $21,000,001 punitive damages (about $28m); the trial court reduced the punitive award to $8,610,000. On appeal the compensatory verdict (reported as about $2.8m against the defendants after apportionment) was affirmed and the punitive award reversed with directions to enter judgment for Watchtower on that claim. The opinion describes a 1 July 1989 letter to elders on confidentiality and a 1 August 1995 letter saying 'steps should be taken to protect the child, or other children'.

Fuente oficial ↗ (se abre en una pestaña nueva) Copia archivada o alternativa ↗ (se abre en una pestaña nueva)