La postura pública actual de la organización es que a las personas expulsadas se las trata 'with respect' (con respeto), que son 'welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted' (bienvenidas a asistir a nuestros servicios religiosos, donde se las puede saludar), que pueden pedir ayuda a los ancianos, y que el cónyuge y los hijos pequeños de una persona expulsada que viven en la misma casa conservan 'normal family affections and dealings' (el afecto y el trato familiar normales); las preguntas frecuentes no abordan el caso de los parientes que viven en otro domicilio, y aplican el texto de 2 Juan sobre no saludar solo a quienes 'actively try to undermine' (intentan activamente socavar) la congregación.

Claim ID claim-shunning-faq-current-positionConcerns 18 de septiembre de 2026Explicación de la organización

Explicación de la organización · 18 de septiembre de 2026 Verificado

La postura pública actual de la organización es que a las personas expulsadas se las trata 'with respect' (con respeto), que son 'welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted' (bienvenidas a asistir a nuestros servicios religiosos, donde se las puede saludar), que pueden pedir ayuda a los ancianos, y que el cónyuge y los hijos pequeños de una persona expulsada que viven en la misma casa conservan 'normal family affections and dealings' (el afecto y el trato familiar normales); las preguntas frecuentes no abordan el caso de los parientes que viven en otro domicilio, y aplican el texto de 2 Juan sobre no saludar solo a quienes 'actively try to undermine' (intentan activamente socavar) la congregación. Source: jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, 18 de septiembre de 2026 Source: Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, 29 de abril de 2026

Mostrar las pruebas (2 fuentes)

Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, “How Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Treat Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?”

18 de septiembre de 2026 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“So we do not socialize with someone who has been removed. However, we do not ignore him completely. We treat him with respect. He is welcome to attend our religious services, where he may be greeted by Jehovah’s Witnesses. He may also request spiritual assistance from the elders.”

Current official statement. Also: 'we reach out' to those who 'slowed down or stopped'; 'The elders simply announce to the congregation that the person is no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses'; spouse and young children in the same house keep 'normal family affections and dealings'; footnote b on terminology; footnote d applies 2 John 9-11 to those who 'actively try to undermine' the congregation. Says nothing about relatives outside the household. Quotes the High Court of England and Wales (7 June 2019) and former ECtHR judge Pinto de Albuquerque.

Fuente oficial (se abre en una pestaña nueva)

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Full page opened at both URLs on 2026-09-19. The old URL https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/shunning/ returns HTTP 301 to this URL (curl -I; server Last-Modified 18 Sep 2026). Earlier titles: 2022 version 'Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Shun Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?' is quoted by the Norwegian Supreme Court (para 125); the still-earlier title 'Do You Shun Former Members of Your Religion?' is attested only by discovery sources (unverified).

Corroborado por. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Notes. Blocked original: https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/shunning/ (now redirects). web.archive.org and archive.ph blocked in this environment.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-jworg-2026-faq-removed-from-the-congregation

Registro público oficial Verificado

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”

29 de abril de 2026 · paras 4, 39-45, 94-102, 110-127, 149-152, 227-230 · Norges Høyesterett

“Members of the religious community are thus not to associate with former members, whether disfellowshipped or withdrawn. This also applies to close relatives, unless they belong to the same household. Family ties are not severed, but with regard to family members other than those with whom one lives, contact is permitted only in necessary family matters. It is undisputed that the threshold for such contact is relatively high.”

3-2 majority (Steen, Arntzen, Hellerslia; Poulsen and Falkanger dissenting) dismissed the State's appeal and declared the refusals of registration and grants invalid; unanimous that infringement of children's rights was not proved; majority: practice 'may entail a clear psychological pressure not to withdraw' (para 123) but not 'improper pressure' under Art. 9 ECHR; dissent: right to withdraw infringed. Costs NOK 2,165,461. Quotes od 2019 p. 148, lvs pp. 39-40, ks 2019 ch. 12 par. 17, w24 Aug p. 24 par. 18, the 2022 jw.org FAQ and a JW brochure 'Jehovah’s Witnesses and Disfellowshipping'.

Fuente oficial (se abre en una pestaña nueva) Escaneo del original (se abre en una pestaña nueva)

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Official English translation PDF (https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/translated-rulings/2026/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf) downloaded and read; all quoted paragraphs confirmed. Norwegian original: https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/avgjorelser/2026/april/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf

Procedencia del escaneo. Supreme Court of Norway, Communication Department translation (legal authenticity remains with the Norwegian text).

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-shunning-faq-current-position/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.

La afirmación y sus pruebas

jw.org, Frequently Asked Questions, “How Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Treat Those Who Used to Belong to Their Religion?”

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”