ClaimBlood doctrineverified1980sExplicit statement

La doctrine sur le sang · Claim record

Le même texte de 1981/1982 indiquait que 'techniques for intraoperative collection or hemodilution that involve blood storage are objectionable', tandis que la dialyse, la circulation extracorporelle amorcée sans sang et la récupération peropératoire ininterrompue étaient admises par de nombreux Témoins.

Claim ID claim-blood-1982-storage-objectionableConcerns 22 juin 1982Déclaration explicite

L’affirmation et ses preuves

Déclaration explicite · 22 juin 1982 Vérifié

Le même texte de 1981/1982 indiquait que 'techniques for intraoperative collection or hemodilution that involve blood storage are objectionable', tandis que la dialyse, la circulation extracorporelle amorcée sans sang et la récupération peropératoire ininterrompue étaient admises par de nombreux Témoins. Source: Awake!, 22 juin 1982Source: The Watchtower, 1 mars 1989

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

Awake!, “Jehovah's Witnesses—The Surgical/Ethical Challenge”

22 juin 1982 · pp.25-27 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society Medical and Research Departments (reprint from JAMA 27 Nov 1981, 246(21):2471-2472) · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“Techniques for intraoperative collection or hemodilution that involve blood storage are objectionable to them.”

Witnesses refuse 'whole blood, packed RBCs, WBCs, or platelets'; 'many Witnesses permit the use of dialysis and heart-lung equipment (non-blood-prime) as well as intraoperative salvage where the extracorporeal circulation is uninterrupted'; albumin, immune globulins and haemophiliac preparations: 'each Witness must decide individually if he can accept these.' Par. 8 (p. 25) states that Witnesses view the biblical prohibitions 'as ruling out transfusion of whole blood, packed RBCs, and plasma, as well as WBC and platelet administration' — the earliest verified naming of all four primary components.

Note de provenance et de vérification for Awake!, Jehovah's Witnesses—The Surgical/Ethical Challenge

Note sur la fiabilité. Opened on WOL. The brief's 'Watchtower 15 Jun 1982 pp. 25-31' is a mis-citation: the 15 Jun 1982 Watchtower articles at those pages do not contain this material.

Corroboré par. src-hb-1990-surgical-ethical-challenge

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-g-1982-0622-surgical-ethical-challenge

Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”

1 mars 1989 · pp.30-31 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“another Christian (who also would not let blood flow from him, be stored for some time, and later be put back into him) might conclude that a circuit with recovery from a surgical site and ongoing reinfusion would not violate his trained conscience.”

On intra-operative blood salvage equipment; some would refuse, others accept if the circuit is continuous.

Note de provenance et de vérification for The Watchtower, Questions From Readers

Note sur la fiabilité. Opened on WOL; confirmed.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-w-1989-0301-qfr-cell-salvage

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-blood-1982-storage-objectionable/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.