El mismo texto de 1981/1982 decía que las 'techniques for intraoperative collection or hemodilution that involve blood storage are objectionable', mientras que la diálisis, la circulación extracorpórea sin cebado de sangre y la recuperación intraoperatoria ininterrumpida eran admitidas por muchos Testigos.

Claim ID claim-blood-1982-storage-objectionableConcerns 22 de junio de 1982Declaración explícita

Declaración explícita · 22 de junio de 1982 Verificado

El mismo texto de 1981/1982 decía que las 'techniques for intraoperative collection or hemodilution that involve blood storage are objectionable', mientras que la diálisis, la circulación extracorpórea sin cebado de sangre y la recuperación intraoperatoria ininterrumpida eran admitidas por muchos Testigos. Source: Awake!, 22 de junio de 1982 Source: The Watchtower, 1 de marzo de 1989

Mostrar las pruebas (2 fuentes)

Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

Awake!, “Jehovah's Witnesses—The Surgical/Ethical Challenge”

22 de junio de 1982 · pp.25-27 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society Medical and Research Departments (reprint from JAMA 27 Nov 1981, 246(21):2471-2472) · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“Techniques for intraoperative collection or hemodilution that involve blood storage are objectionable to them.”

Witnesses refuse 'whole blood, packed RBCs, WBCs, or platelets'; 'many Witnesses permit the use of dialysis and heart-lung equipment (non-blood-prime) as well as intraoperative salvage where the extracorporeal circulation is uninterrupted'; albumin, immune globulins and haemophiliac preparations: 'each Witness must decide individually if he can accept these.' Par. 8 (p. 25) states that Witnesses view the biblical prohibitions 'as ruling out transfusion of whole blood, packed RBCs, and plasma, as well as WBC and platelet administration' — the earliest verified naming of all four primary components.

Fuente oficial (se abre en una pestaña nueva)

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Opened on WOL. The brief's 'Watchtower 15 Jun 1982 pp. 25-31' is a mis-citation: the 15 Jun 1982 Watchtower articles at those pages do not contain this material.

Corroborado por. src-hb-1990-surgical-ethical-challenge

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-g-1982-0622-surgical-ethical-challenge

Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”

1 de marzo de 1989 · pp.30-31 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“another Christian (who also would not let blood flow from him, be stored for some time, and later be put back into him) might conclude that a circuit with recovery from a surgical site and ongoing reinfusion would not violate his trained conscience.”

On intra-operative blood salvage equipment; some would refuse, others accept if the circuit is continuous.

Fuente oficial (se abre en una pestaña nueva)

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Opened on WOL; confirmed.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-w-1989-0301-qfr-cell-salvage

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-blood-1982-storage-objectionable/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.

La afirmación y sus pruebas

Awake!, “Jehovah's Witnesses—The Surgical/Ethical Challenge”

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”