ClaimBlood doctrineverified1980sContext

La doctrine sur le sang · Claim record

La Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. est intervenue comme amicus curiae devant la Cour suprême de l'Illinois dans l'affaire In re E.G., représentée par Donald T. Ridley, de Brooklyn ; l'organisation était donc partie prenante au litige qu'elle a ensuite décrit à ses lecteurs.

Claim ID claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicusConcerns 18 novembre 1989Contexte

L’affirmation et ses preuves

Contexte · 18 novembre 1989 Vérifié

La Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. est intervenue comme amicus curiae devant la Cour suprême de l'Illinois dans l'affaire In re E.G., représentée par Donald T. Ridley, de Brooklyn ; l'organisation était donc partie prenante au litige qu'elle a ensuite décrit à ses lecteurs. Source: Illinois Supreme Court, 18 novembre 1989

Afficher les preuves (1 source)
Document public officiel Vérifié

Illinois Supreme Court, “In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089”

18 novembre 1989 · pp.133 Ill. 2d 98 · Ryan J · Illinois Supreme Court

“If the evidence is clear and convincing that the minor is mature enough to appreciate the consequences of her actions, and that the minor is mature enough to exercise the judgment of an adult, then the mature minor doctrine affords her the common law right to consent to or refuse medical treatment.”

The passage the 22 May 1994 Awake! quotes, confirmed against the reported text. Opinion filed 18 November 1989; rehearing denied 29 January 1990; Ward and Clark JJ dissenting. The head matter records that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. appeared as amicus curiae, by Donald T. Ridley of Brooklyn, New York.

Note de provenance et de vérification for Illinois Supreme Court, In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089

Note sur la fiabilité. The full reported opinion was downloaded from the Caselaw Access Project and read; the quoted sentence, the parties, the date and the amicus entry were confirmed. Justia and CourtListener both refuse automated requests in this environment.

Provenance de la numérisation. Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School Library) static distribution of the official Illinois Reports text.

Corroboré par. src-g94d-gregory-appeals-and-standard

Notes. The Court decided the case on common-law grounds and expressly declined to decide the First Amendment question on which the Appellate Court had relied.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-g94d-ilsc-1989-eg-standard

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicus/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.