ClaimBlood doctrineverified1980sContext

Doutrina sobre o sangue · Claim record

A Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. atuou como amicus curiae na Suprema Corte de Illinois no caso In re E.G., representada por Donald T. Ridley, de Brooklyn; a organização foi, portanto, participante do litígio que mais tarde descreveu a seus leitores.

Claim ID claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicusConcerns 18 de novembro de 1989Contexto

A afirmação e as suas provas

Contexto · 18 de novembro de 1989 Verificado

A Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. atuou como amicus curiae na Suprema Corte de Illinois no caso In re E.G., representada por Donald T. Ridley, de Brooklyn; a organização foi, portanto, participante do litígio que mais tarde descreveu a seus leitores. Source: Illinois Supreme Court, 18 de novembro de 1989

Mostrar as provas (1 fonte)
Registro público oficial Verificado

Illinois Supreme Court, “In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089”

18 de novembro de 1989 · pp.133 Ill. 2d 98 · Ryan J · Illinois Supreme Court

“If the evidence is clear and convincing that the minor is mature enough to appreciate the consequences of her actions, and that the minor is mature enough to exercise the judgment of an adult, then the mature minor doctrine affords her the common law right to consent to or refuse medical treatment.”

The passage the 22 May 1994 Awake! quotes, confirmed against the reported text. Opinion filed 18 November 1989; rehearing denied 29 January 1990; Ward and Clark JJ dissenting. The head matter records that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. appeared as amicus curiae, by Donald T. Ridley of Brooklyn, New York.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Illinois Supreme Court, In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089

Nota de confiança. The full reported opinion was downloaded from the Caselaw Access Project and read; the quoted sentence, the parties, the date and the amicus entry were confirmed. Justia and CourtListener both refuse automated requests in this environment.

Procedência da digitalização. Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School Library) static distribution of the official Illinois Reports text.

Corroborado por. src-g94d-gregory-appeals-and-standard

Notes. The Court decided the case on common-law grounds and expressly declined to decide the First Amendment question on which the Appellate Court had relied.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-g94d-ilsc-1989-eg-standard

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicus/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.