Accountability
Corrections log
If we get something wrong, we say so here, in public, with the date. An evidence resource that hides its corrections is not one you should trust.
Se você é citado pelo nome neste site, ou é familiar de alguém citado, você pode nos pedir para remover ou alterar o que aqui se diz sobre você. Escreva para [email protected]. Nós responderemos, e removeremos um nome sempre que o ponto puder ser apresentado sem ele. Você não precisa explicar por quê, e não precisa demonstrar que algo esteja incorreto.
| Date | Page | What happened | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 September 2026 | / | First release. No published corrections yet. Errors reported through the report-an-error page will be logged here with the date, the page affected, what was wrong and what was changed. | corrected |
| 19 September 2026 | /doctrine/ | The Golden Age sentence about serum inoculations and vaccinations polluting the blood stream was presented as the magazine’s own advice to readers. It is a signed contribution by H. W. Newcomb, beginning on page 106 of the issue of 13 November 1929 and listed in the contents under “Science and Invention”. The source record gave no author and the article title “(dietetics article)”. Treating a signed contribution as a publication’s editorial voice is the same error this site corrects in other people’s citations of the same sentence. The record, the claim and the vaccination comparison now name the author and say what the by-line means. Found by an internal adversarial review, not reported by a reader. | corrected |
| 19 September 2026 | /doctrine/ | The sentence describing vaccination as a violation of the covenant with Noah, attributed to The Golden Age of 4 February 1931, was carried in a quotation field although no copy of that issue had been opened. Its wording came from campaigning and reference websites which may not be independent of one another. Under this site’s own rule such sites locate a document and never supply the evidence, so the quotation has been removed, the record downgraded to unverified, and the point is now described as reported rather than quoted. Found by an internal adversarial review. | corrected |
Como funcionam as correções
- Qualquer pessoa pode relatar um erro. Os relatos que citam o identificador de uma afirmação ou de uma fonte são os mais rápidos de conferir.
- Nós reabrimos a fonte citada. Se a redação, a data, a página ou o contexto estiverem errados, corrigimos o registro e a página, e anotamos isso aqui.
- Se um relato for recusado, também anotamos isso, com o motivo, para que os leitores possam julgar por si mesmos.
- Quando a organização publicou uma resposta a algo que documentamos, nós a acrescentamos à afirmação correspondente como “a posição da organização”.