Accountability

Corrections log

If we get something wrong, we say so here, in public, with the date. An evidence resource that hides its corrections is not one you should trust.

Se il tuo nome compare su questo sito, o se sei un familiare di una persona nominata, puoi chiederci di rimuovere o modificare ciò che qui viene detto di te. Scrivi a [email protected]. Ti risponderemo, e rimuoveremo un nome ogni volta che il punto può essere esposto senza di esso. Non devi spiegarne il motivo, e non devi dimostrare che qualcosa sia inesatto.

Corrections, newest first
Date	Page	What happened	Status
19 September 2026	/	First release. No published corrections yet. Errors reported through the report-an-error page will be logged here with the date, the page affected, what was wrong and what was changed.	corrected
19 September 2026	/doctrine/	The Golden Age sentence about serum inoculations and vaccinations polluting the blood stream was presented as the magazine’s own advice to readers. It is a signed contribution by H. W. Newcomb, beginning on page 106 of the issue of 13 November 1929 and listed in the contents under “Science and Invention”. The source record gave no author and the article title “(dietetics article)”. Treating a signed contribution as a publication’s editorial voice is the same error this site corrects in other people’s citations of the same sentence. The record, the claim and the vaccination comparison now name the author and say what the by-line means. Found by an internal adversarial review, not reported by a reader.	corrected
19 September 2026	/doctrine/	The sentence describing vaccination as a violation of the covenant with Noah, attributed to The Golden Age of 4 February 1931, was carried in a quotation field although no copy of that issue had been opened. Its wording came from campaigning and reference websites which may not be independent of one another. Under this site’s own rule such sites locate a document and never supply the evidence, so the quotation has been removed, the record downgraded to unverified, and the point is now described as reported rather than quoted. Found by an internal adversarial review.	corrected

Come funzionano le correzioni

Chiunque può segnalare un errore. Le segnalazioni che citano l’identificativo di un’affermazione o di una fonte sono le più rapide da verificare.
Riapriamo la fonte citata. Se la formulazione, la data, la pagina o il contesto sono errati, correggiamo il registro e la pagina, e lo annotiamo qui.
Se una segnalazione viene respinta, annotiamo anche questo, con la motivazione, così che i lettori possano giudicare da sé.
Quando l’organizzazione ha pubblicato una risposta a qualcosa che documentiamo, la aggiungiamo all’affermazione pertinente come «la posizione dell’organizzazione».