ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified2010sOrganisation's explanation

La chronologie et 607 av. n. è. · Claim record

Une note de bas de page d’un article de l’organisation elle-même déclare : 'None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.'

Claim ID claim-chronology-org-concedes-no-expertConcerns 1 novembre 2011Explication de l’organisation

L’affirmation et ses preuves

Explication de l’organisation · 1 novembre 2011 Vérifié

Une note de bas de page d’un article de l’organisation elle-même déclare : 'None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.' Source: The Watchtower, 1 novembre 2011

Afficher les preuves (1 source)
Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part Two, footnote c”

1 novembre 2011 · p.23 · footnote c · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Note: None of the secular experts quoted in this article hold that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E.”

The article quotes R. H. Sack, John Steele, David Brown and R. J. van der Spek on the limits of the cuneiform evidence, and adds this footnote.

Note de provenance et de vérification for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part Two, footnote c

Note sur la fiabilité. Read in the Watchtower Online Library text of the article on 19 September 2026 in the [Footnotes] section. The Online Library prints all footnotes together at the end of the article, so the page is taken from the position of the footnote’s reference marker in the body: the marker for note c falls between the page markers for pages 23 and 24.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-c

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-chronology-org-concedes-no-expert/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.