ClaimShunning and familyverified2020sIndependent finding

Ostracisme et famille · Claim record

Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour suprême de Norvège (HR-2026-1009-A), par trois voix contre deux, a jugé invalides les refus d'enregistrement et de subventions : les cinq juges ont estimé que l'atteinte aux droits des enfants n'était pas établie ; la majorité a conclu que la pratique d'ostracisme 'peut impliquer une nette pression psychologique dissuadant de se retirer', mais non une 'pression abusive' au sens de l'article 9 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme ; deux juges ont estimé que le droit de se retirer était enfreint ; la cour a décrit la pratique actuelle comme une absence de relations avec les anciens membres, y compris les proches vivant hors du foyer, sauf pour des 'necessary family matters'.

Claim ID claim-shunning-norway-2026-supreme-courtConcerns 29 avril 2026Constat indépendant

L’affirmation et ses preuves

Constat indépendant · 29 avril 2026 Vérifié

Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour suprême de Norvège (HR-2026-1009-A), par trois voix contre deux, a jugé invalides les refus d'enregistrement et de subventions : les cinq juges ont estimé que l'atteinte aux droits des enfants n'était pas établie ; la majorité a conclu que la pratique d'ostracisme 'peut impliquer une nette pression psychologique dissuadant de se retirer', mais non une 'pression abusive' au sens de l'article 9 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme ; deux juges ont estimé que le droit de se retirer était enfreint ; la cour a décrit la pratique actuelle comme une absence de relations avec les anciens membres, y compris les proches vivant hors du foyer, sauf pour des 'necessary family matters'. Source: Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, 29 avril 2026Source: jw.org Newsroom, 8 mai 2026Source: Religion Clause (law blog by Prof. Howard M. Friedman), 7 mai 2026

Position de l’organisation ou explication ultérieure : jw.org : la décision 'protects several fundamental human rights... including freedom of religion and personal autonomy'.

Afficher les preuves (3 sources)
Document public officiel Vérifié

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”

29 avril 2026 · paras 4, 39-45, 94-102, 110-127, 149-152, 227-230 · Norges Høyesterett

“Members of the religious community are thus not to associate with former members, whether disfellowshipped or withdrawn. This also applies to close relatives, unless they belong to the same household. Family ties are not severed, but with regard to family members other than those with whom one lives, contact is permitted only in necessary family matters. It is undisputed that the threshold for such contact is relatively high.”

3-2 majority (Steen, Arntzen, Hellerslia; Poulsen and Falkanger dissenting) dismissed the State's appeal and declared the refusals of registration and grants invalid; unanimous that infringement of children's rights was not proved; majority: practice 'may entail a clear psychological pressure not to withdraw' (para 123) but not 'improper pressure' under Art. 9 ECHR; dissent: right to withdraw infringed. Costs NOK 2,165,461. Quotes od 2019 p. 148, lvs pp. 39-40, ks 2019 ch. 12 par. 17, w24 Aug p. 24 par. 18, the 2022 jw.org FAQ and a JW brochure 'Jehovah’s Witnesses and Disfellowshipping'.

Note de provenance et de vérification for Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)

Note sur la fiabilité. Official English translation PDF (https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/translated-rulings/2026/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf) downloaded and read; all quoted paragraphs confirmed. Norwegian original: https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/avgjorelser/2026/april/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf

Provenance de la numérisation. Supreme Court of Norway, Communication Department translation (legal authenticity remains with the Norwegian text).

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Publication primaire des Témoins de Jéhovah Vérifié

jw.org Newsroom, “Norwegian Supreme Court Issues Significant Ruling in Favor of Jehovah’s Witnesses”

8 mai 2026 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“The decision protects several fundamental human rights for all people in Norway, including freedom of religion and personal autonomy.”

Statement by Jørgen Pedersen (Scandinavia Branch Committee). A companion piece dated 30 April 2026 (jw.org/en/global-communications/country/norway/Norways-Supreme-Court-Rules-to-Protect-Citizens-Right-to-Believe/) reports costs of about NOK 11,864,000 and describes the practice as 'the removal of unrepentant wrongdoers from the congregation'.

Note de provenance et de vérification for jw.org Newsroom, Norwegian Supreme Court Issues Significant Ruling in Favor of Jehovah’s Witnesses

Note sur la fiabilité. Both pages opened; dates and wording confirmed. jw.org gives the decision date as 30 April 2026; the judgment itself is dated 29 April 2026.

Notes. Date discrepancy (29 vs 30 April) noted; the judgment PDF controls.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-jworg-2026-0508-norway-supreme-court-release

Presse sérieuse Vérifié

Religion Clause (law blog by Prof. Howard M. Friedman), “Norway’s Supreme Court Upholds Jehovah’s Witnesses State Registration and Funding”

7 mai 2026 · Howard M. Friedman · Religion Clause

“A majority of three justices found that the shunning practice does not constitute undue pressure on members in breach of Article 9 of the ECHR.”

Secondary report of HR-2026-1009-A that led to the official domstol.no summary and PDF.

Note de provenance et de vérification for Religion Clause (law blog by Prof. Howard M. Friedman), Norway’s Supreme Court Upholds Jehovah’s Witnesses State Registration and Funding

Note sur la fiabilité. Page opened; used only to locate the official judgment.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-religionclause-2026-0507-norway-supreme-court

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-shunning-norway-2026-supreme-court/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.