JWTruth.orgRecurso documentado de comparación
Ask JWTruth Buscar
Español

Esta página en

Solo en inglés

Todos los idiomas

Cronología y 607 a. E.C. · Claim record

El desacuerdo real entre los historiadores sobre la destrucción de Jerusalén se da entre 587 y 586 a.E.C., un solo año, y depende de si Judá contaba los años de reinado desde tisrí o desde nisán. Un repaso de la bibliografía halló once especialistas a cada lado. Ninguna cronología generalmente aceptada del período admite una diferencia de veinte años.

Claim ID claim-chronology-dispute-is-one-yearConcerns marzo de 2004Contexto
Contexto · marzo de 2004 Verificado

El desacuerdo real entre los historiadores sobre la destrucción de Jerusalén se da entre 587 y 586 a.E.C., un solo año, y depende de si Judá contaba los años de reinado desde tisrí o desde nisán. Un repaso de la bibliografía halló once especialistas a cada lado. Ninguna cronología generalmente aceptada del período admite una diferencia de veinte años. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 47/1, marzo de 2004Chronicles of Chaldaean Kings (626-556 B.C.) in the British Museum, 1956The Watchtower, 1 de octubre de 2011

La posición de la organización o su explicación posterior: La organización lo reconoce: 'Both years are mentioned in secular sources. For simplicity, we will refer to 587 B.C.E. in this series.'

Mostrar las pruebas (3 fuentes)
Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 47/1, “When Did Jerusalem Fall?”

marzo de 2004 · pp.21-38 · Rodger C. Young · Evangelical Theological Society

“Although the Scriptures state that the end came in the fourth month of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, scholars are divided on whether this refers to 586 bc or 587 bc. Jeremy Hughes listed eleven scholars who preferred the first date and eleven who preferred the second.”

A survey of the scholarly disagreement about the year Jerusalem fell. The article's conclusion is that 'Jerusalem fell in the fourth month (Tammuz) of 587 bc'. The whole disagreement in the literature is between two adjacent years.

Fuente oficial

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. The PDF was downloaded from the author's own site on 19 September 2026 and read. It carries the running header 'JETS 47/1 (March 2004) 21-38' and 'journal of the evangelical theological society'. The publisher's own copy on etsjets.org redirected and was not opened.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-wiseman-1956-p30-37th-year

Notes. Young notes that the fixed points are the battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE and the capture of Jehoiachin in spring 597 BCE, both from Babylonian records.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-young-2004-jets

Revisado por pares / académico Verificado

Chronicles of Chaldaean Kings (626-556 B.C.) in the British Museum, “Introduction: Egypt and Babylon”

1956 · p.30 · D. J. Wiseman · The Trustees of the British Museum, London

“a fragmentary text, B.M. 33041, which is a religious rather than a 'Chronicle' version of historical events in the thirty-seventh year of Nebuchadrezzar (568/7 B.C.)”

Discussing the Babylonian invasion of Egypt, Wiseman dates Nebuchadnezzar II's thirty-seventh year to 568/567 BCE on the basis of a tablet entirely independent of the astronomical diary VAT 4956.

Escaneo del original

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. Read in the ETANA PDF on 19 September 2026; running head '30 CHRONICLES OF CHALDAEAN KINGS' immediately above. On the same page Wiseman dates the final siege of Jerusalem to '588-586 B.C.'

Procedencia del escaneo. Full scan of the British Museum volume hosted by ETANA (Electronic Tools and Ancient Near Eastern Archives), an academic digital-library consortium. Copyright the Trustees of the British Museum, 1956.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-ebl-vat4956-line1

Notes. The same volume, on p. 30, refers to 'the siege of Jerusalem for a time in 588-586 B.C.', i.e. the mainstream range, not 607.

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-wiseman-1956-p30-37th-year

Publicación primaria de los testigos de Jehová Verificado

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?-Part One”

1 de octubre de 2011 · pp.26-31 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“So why do Jehovah's Witnesses hold to a date that differs from widely accepted chronology by 20 years? In short, because of evidence within the Bible itself.”

The organisation’s fullest modern statement of its case for 607 BCE. It opens by printing a reader’s question — “586 or 587 B.C.E. is generally accepted as the year of Jerusalem’s destruction. Why do Jehovah’s Witnesses say that it was 607 B.C.E.?” — and answers it. In its own words, in the summary box on page 31: “Secular historians usually say that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 B.C.E.” The article rests its own date on a literal seventy-year exile ending in 537 BCE.

Fuente oficial

Nota de procedencia y verificación

Nota de confianza. The whole article was fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read with the page markers (span class="pageNum") intact; the quotation falls between the markers for pages 26 and 27, that is, on page 26.

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-w11-1101-part-two

Consultado. 19 de septiembre de 2026 · Identificador de la fuente. src-chr-e-w11-1001-part-one

Página de la afirmación Corregir o actualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/es/evidence/claim-chronology-dispute-is-one-year/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.