JWTruth.orgRessource documentaire comparative
Ask JWTruth Rechercher
Français

Cette page en

En anglais uniquement

Toutes les langues

La chronologie et 607 av. n. è. · Claim record

La chronologie de référence de Parker et Dubberstein fixe chaque règne néo-babylonien à partir de tablettes commerciales et administratives datées. Au passage de Nabuchodonosor II à Amel-Mardouk, la dernière tablette de l’ancien règne et la première du nouveau portent la même date, le 7 octobre 562 av. n. è. ; au passage d’Amel-Mardouk à Nériglissar, l’écart est de six jours.

Claim ID claim-chronology-business-tablets-transitionsConcerns 1942Déclaration explicite
Déclaration explicite · 1942 Vérifié

La chronologie de référence de Parker et Dubberstein fixe chaque règne néo-babylonien à partir de tablettes commerciales et administratives datées. Au passage de Nabuchodonosor II à Amel-Mardouk, la dernière tablette de l’ancien règne et la première du nouveau portent la même date, le 7 octobre 562 av. n. è. ; au passage d’Amel-Mardouk à Nériglissar, l’écart est de six jours. Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942

Position de l’organisation ou explication ultérieure : L’organisation met en avant des tablettes qui paraissent dater le successeur de Nabuchodonosor avant la fin de la dernière année de règne de celui-ci, et demande si le registre est continu.

Afficher les preuves (2 sources)
Évalué par des pairs / universitaire Vérifié

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “II. Kings' Reigns: Nebuchadnezzar II and Amel-Marduk”

1942 · pp.9-10 · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“Evidence for End of Reign VI/14/43 (Sept. 25, 562), Uruk ... VI/26/43 (Oct. 7, 562), Uruk ... The first tablet dated to Amel-Marduk (see below) comes from Sippar (?) and is dated on the same day as the last tablet of Nebuchadnezzar from Uruk. Accordingly Nebuchadnezzar died during the first days of October, 562.”

The standard reference chronology establishes the length of each Neo-Babylonian reign from dated business and administrative tablets, listing for every king the last tablet of his reign and the first tablet of his successor's. At this junction the two are dated to the same day.

Source officielle Numérisation de l’original

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. The full PDF was downloaded from the ISAC asset server on 19 September 2026, converted with pdftotext and read. The running head reads '10 BABYLONIAN CHRONOLOGY 626 B.C.--A.D. 45'.

Provenance de la numérisation. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Corroboré par. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29, src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-e

Notes. The same pages show Amel-Marduk’s last tablet on 7 August 560 and Neriglissar’s first on 13 August 560, a gap of six days. Page 10 also carries Labashi-Marduk: first dated tablet 22 May 556, last 20 June 556, with the conclusion that he “seems to have been recognized as king only in May and June, 556”. He is the one king the organisation says Ptolemy omitted who falls inside the Neo-Babylonian dynasty, and the standard chronology accounts for him in weeks, not years.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-chr-e-pd-1942-p9-10-transitions

Évalué par des pairs / universitaire Vérifié

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “Preface”

1942 · pp.vii · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“This study aims at providing a brief, but complete and thorough, presentation of the data bearing upon the chronological problems of the Neo-Babylonian, Achaemenid Persian, and Seleucid periods, together with tables for the easy translation of dates from the Babylonian calendar into the Julian.”

The authors describe the scope of the work that became, in its revised 1956 edition (Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 75), the standard reference for converting Babylonian dates.

Source officielle Numérisation de l’original

Note de provenance et de vérification

Note sur la fiabilité. Read in the ISAC PDF on 19 September 2026. Only the 1942 edition (626 B.C.-A.D. 45) was opened in this session; the 1956 Brown University Press revision, which extends to A.D. 75, was not opened and its page numbers are not cited here.

Provenance de la numérisation. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Notes. Wiseman's 1956 volume states that its Julian dates 'follow the tables of R. A. Parker and W. H. Dubberstein in Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 45'.

Date de consultation. 19 septembre 2026 · Identifiant de la source. src-chr-e-pd-1942-preface

Page de l’affirmation Corriger ou mettre à jour

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/fr/evidence/claim-chronology-business-tablets-transitions/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.