ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified1940sExplicit statement

Cronologia e 607 AEC · Claim record

A cronologia de referência de Parker e Dubberstein fixa cada reinado neobabilônico a partir de tabuinhas comerciais e administrativas datadas. Na passagem de Nabucodonosor II para Amel-Marduk, a última tabuinha do reinado antigo e a primeira do novo estão datadas do mesmo dia, 7 de outubro de 562 AEC; na passagem de Amel-Marduk para Neriglissar, o intervalo é de seis dias.

Claim ID claim-chronology-business-tablets-transitionsConcerns 1942Declaração explícita

A afirmação e as suas provas

Declaração explícita · 1942 Verificado

A cronologia de referência de Parker e Dubberstein fixa cada reinado neobabilônico a partir de tabuinhas comerciais e administrativas datadas. Na passagem de Nabucodonosor II para Amel-Marduk, a última tabuinha do reinado antigo e a primeira do novo estão datadas do mesmo dia, 7 de outubro de 562 AEC; na passagem de Amel-Marduk para Neriglissar, o intervalo é de seis dias. Source: Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942Source: Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), 1942

A posição da organização ou explicação posterior: A organização aponta tabuinhas que parecem datar o sucessor de Nabucodonosor antes do fim do último ano de Nabucodonosor e pergunta se o registro é contínuo.

Mostrar as provas (2 fontes)
Revisado por pares / acadêmico Verificado

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “II. Kings' Reigns: Nebuchadnezzar II and Amel-Marduk”

1942 · pp.9-10 · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“Evidence for End of Reign VI/14/43 (Sept. 25, 562), Uruk ... VI/26/43 (Oct. 7, 562), Uruk ... The first tablet dated to Amel-Marduk (see below) comes from Sippar (?) and is dated on the same day as the last tablet of Nebuchadnezzar from Uruk. Accordingly Nebuchadnezzar died during the first days of October, 562.”

The standard reference chronology establishes the length of each Neo-Babylonian reign from dated business and administrative tablets, listing for every king the last tablet of his reign and the first tablet of his successor's. At this junction the two are dated to the same day.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), II. Kings' Reigns: Nebuchadnezzar II and Amel-Marduk

Nota de confiança. The full PDF was downloaded from the ISAC asset server on 19 September 2026, converted with pdftotext and read. The running head reads '10 BABYLONIAN CHRONOLOGY 626 B.C.--A.D. 45'.

Procedência da digitalização. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Corroborado por. src-chr-e-oracc-adadguppi-i29, src-chr-e-w11-1101-footnote-e

Notes. The same pages show Amel-Marduk’s last tablet on 7 August 560 and Neriglissar’s first on 13 August 560, a gap of six days. Page 10 also carries Labashi-Marduk: first dated tablet 22 May 556, last 20 June 556, with the conclusion that he “seems to have been recognized as king only in May and June, 556”. He is the one king the organisation says Ptolemy omitted who falls inside the Neo-Babylonian dynasty, and the standard chronology accounts for him in weeks, not years.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-chr-e-pd-1942-p9-10-transitions

Revisado por pares / acadêmico Verificado

Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), “Preface”

1942 · pp.vii · Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein · Oriental Institute, University of Chicago

“This study aims at providing a brief, but complete and thorough, presentation of the data bearing upon the chronological problems of the Neo-Babylonian, Achaemenid Persian, and Seleucid periods, together with tables for the easy translation of dates from the Babylonian calendar into the Julian.”

The authors describe the scope of the work that became, in its revised 1956 edition (Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 75), the standard reference for converting Babylonian dates.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C. - A.D. 45 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 24), Preface

Nota de confiança. Read in the ISAC PDF on 19 September 2026. Only the 1942 edition (626 B.C.-A.D. 45) was opened in this session; the 1956 Brown University Press revision, which extends to A.D. 75, was not opened and its page numbers are not cited here.

Procedência da digitalização. Free PDF of the volume published by the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (formerly the Oriental Institute), University of Chicago; CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; DOI https://doi.org/10.83354/68x5-8f30

Notes. Wiseman's 1956 volume states that its Julian dates 'follow the tables of R. A. Parker and W. H. Dubberstein in Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 45'.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-chr-e-pd-1942-preface

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-chronology-business-tablets-transitions/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.