ClaimAuthority and accountabilityverified1930sIndependent finding

Autoridade e prestação de contas · Claim record

O cônsul-geral americano em Berlim relatou a Washington, em 12 de julho de 1933, que havia lido alguns dos panfletos da Sociedade e “pode ver que objeções a eles poderiam razoavelmente ser levantadas pelo Governo alemão”, e que, embora a Sociedade estivesse “agindo como uma sociedade religiosa, os panfletos contêm comentários de caráter não puramente religioso”. Ele havia dito a Rutherford que o Consulado-Geral poderia usar seus bons ofícios “apenas para proteger os bens físicos da organização, excluindo panfletos, livretos e brochuras que a polícia havia condenado como antirrevolucionários e de tendência comunista”. Em 9 de setembro de 1933, o Secretário de Estado instruiu o Embaixador a protestar junto ao Ministério das Relações Exteriores alemão porque os bens da Sociedade haviam sido confiscados e suas atividades suprimidas “por ação administrativa sem processo judicial”, e a pedir a restituição dos bens, ao mesmo tempo que o autorizava a subordinar, por questão de conveniência, a questão da retomada das atividades da Sociedade.

Claim ID claim-authority-de33-us-diplomatic-recordConcerns 12 de julho de 1933Conclusão independente

A afirmação e as suas provas

Conclusão independente · 12 de julho de 1933 Verificado

O cônsul-geral americano em Berlim relatou a Washington, em 12 de julho de 1933, que havia lido alguns dos panfletos da Sociedade e “pode ver que objeções a eles poderiam razoavelmente ser levantadas pelo Governo alemão”, e que, embora a Sociedade estivesse “agindo como uma sociedade religiosa, os panfletos contêm comentários de caráter não puramente religioso”. Ele havia dito a Rutherford que o Consulado-Geral poderia usar seus bons ofícios “apenas para proteger os bens físicos da organização, excluindo panfletos, livretos e brochuras que a polícia havia condenado como antirrevolucionários e de tendência comunista”. Em 9 de setembro de 1933, o Secretário de Estado instruiu o Embaixador a protestar junto ao Ministério das Relações Exteriores alemão porque os bens da Sociedade haviam sido confiscados e suas atividades suprimidas “por ação administrativa sem processo judicial”, e a pedir a restituição dos bens, ao mesmo tempo que o autorizava a subordinar, por questão de conveniência, a questão da retomada das atividades da Sociedade. Source: Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, 12 de julho de 1933Source: Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, 12 de julho de 1933Source: Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, 9 de setembro de 1933

A posição da organização ou explicação posterior: Os próprios relatos da organização registram que o Departamento de Estado americano agiu em favor dela e que os bens de Magdeburg foram devolvidos em outubro de 1933, enquanto a proibição de suas atividades permanecia.

Mostrar as provas (3 fontes)
Registro público oficial Verificado

Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, “The Consul General at Berlin (Messersmith) to the Acting Secretary of State, No. 1428”

12 de julho de 1933 · pp.409-410 · George S. Messersmith · United States Department of State

“I have gone into the activities of the Society and of its agents, and have read some of the pamphlets which have been distributed by the Society widely in Germany, and I can see that objection could reasonably be raised to them by the German Government. Although acting as a religious society, the pamphlets contain comment of not a purely religious character.”

Messersmith's own assessment, sent to Washington three weeks after the Berlin convention. A separate telegram of the same month states that the Embassy and Consulate General “have considered it impossible to object to ban on activities”.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, The Consul General at Berlin (Messersmith) to the Acting Secretary of State, No. 1428

Nota de confiança. Opened on the US Department of State Office of the Historian site on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the companion telegram is document 287 in the same volume.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-de33-frus-consulate-view

Registro público oficial Verificado

Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, “The Consul General at Berlin (Messersmith) to the Acting Secretary of State, No. 1428”

12 de julho de 1933 · p.408 · George S. Messersmith · United States Department of State

“The work of the Society has been at an utter standstill in all the states of Germany except Prussia; but on June 24 a decree was issued by the Prussian Ministry of the Interior and signed by Dr. Grauert, the Under Secretary of State in that Ministry. . . . In the decree of June 24 forbidding the activities of the Society throughout Germany, it was also provided that the property be confiscated.”

A despatch from the American Consul General in Berlin reporting on the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. It records that Rutherford had been in Europe for a number of months, came to Germany “a number of weeks ago” and had a long interview at the Consulate General with Consul Geist, and that it was pointed out to him that the Consulate General “would be unable to make any representations to the German Government regarding the ban that had been put upon their activities and that it could use its good offices only to protect the physical property of the organization excluding pamphlets, booklets and brochures which the police had condemned as being anti-revolutionary and communistic in tendency”.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, The Consul General at Berlin (Messersmith) to the Acting Secretary of State, No. 1428

Nota de confiança. Opened on the United States Department of State Office of the Historian site on 19 September 2026 and read in full. Both sentences quoted stand on p. 408 of the printed edition, whose page breaks are marked in the text; the despatch as a whole runs pp. 407-410. The ellipsis stands for three sentences about the copy of the decree enclosed with the despatch, about the legal complexities it raised, and about the powers conferred by the Reich President’s decree of 28 February 1933.

Notes. This confirms from a contemporaneous, non-Witness record that the Prussian ban was decreed on 24 June 1933, the day before the Berlin convention.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-de33-frus-messersmith-1428

Registro público oficial Verificado

Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, “The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in Germany (Dodd), No. 111”

9 de setembro de 1933 · pp.412-413 · Cordell Hull · United States Department of State

“It is unfortunate that purely administrative action entailing such drastic consequences without other than ex parte proceedings should be taken and maintained in Germany, and that apparently the obligation to administer justice by orderly processes of law has been disregarded. . . . You should request that prompt steps be taken to restore the property to the possession and control of the Society. You are authorized in your discretion to subordinate as a matter of expediency the question of the resumption of the Society’s activities, keeping in mind, however, that the principle upon which a complaint rests regarding this ban on the activities is the same as in the case of the confiscation or destruction of property, namely, the absence of a proper judicial hearing as provided for under Article 12 of the Treaty of 1923.”

A telegraphed instruction from the Secretary of State to the American Ambassador in Berlin, sent two days after the telegram about the burning of the Society’s books. It sets out that the Society was organised under the laws of Pennsylvania, that its property at Magdeburg was taken and its activities suppressed on or about 24 April 1933 “without explanation”, and that “the German authorities have not instituted proceedings in which they are required to specify and prove charges and in which representatives of the Society would be given opportunity to answer and defend”. The material omitted at the ellipsis is the sentence citing Article 12 of the Treaty of 1923 and the sentence instructing the Ambassador to communicate with the German Foreign Office.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1933, Volume II, The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in Germany (Dodd), No. 111

Nota de confiança. Opened on the United States Department of State Office of the Historian site on 19 September 2026 and read in full. The telegram begins on p. 412 and the passages quoted stand on p. 413, the page break marked in the text falling inside the words “on or about April 24, 1933”.

Corroborado por. src-de33-frus-burning-telegram

Notes. This is the United States protesting the absence of any judicial process, not endorsing the Society’s case on the merits: the same volume carries the Consul General’s opinion that objection to the pamphlets “could reasonably be raised” by the German government.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-de33-frus-hull-instruction

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-authority-de33-us-diplomatic-record/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.