JWTruth.orgRecurso documentado de comparação
Ask JWTruth Pesquisar
Português (Brasil)

Esta página em

Somente em inglês

Todos os idiomas

Doutrina sobre o sangue · Claim record

O juiz Wells indeferiu os pedidos do Diretor de Bem-Estar Infantil, entendeu que não se havia demonstrado que o sangue fosse essencial — ‘not been demonstrated to be essential’ — e que ele ‘could be harmful’ naquelas circunstâncias, e declarou o menino um menor maduro cujo desejo de receber tratamento sem sangue devia ser respeitado; a Suprema Corte do Canadá resumiu depois essa mesma decisão, publicada como Re A.Y. (1993), 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91, e registrou que o juiz Wells observou que o tratamento tinha menos de quarenta por cento de probabilidade de ser eficaz, não era ‘essential’ e era contrário aos desejos do adolescente maduro.

Claim ID claim-blood-1994-yeatts-court-findingsConcerns 19 de julho de 1993Contexto
Contexto · 19 de julho de 1993 Verificado

O juiz Wells indeferiu os pedidos do Diretor de Bem-Estar Infantil, entendeu que não se havia demonstrado que o sangue fosse essencial — ‘not been demonstrated to be essential’ — e que ele ‘could be harmful’ naquelas circunstâncias, e declarou o menino um menor maduro cujo desejo de receber tratamento sem sangue devia ser respeitado; a Suprema Corte do Canadá resumiu depois essa mesma decisão, publicada como Re A.Y. (1993), 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91, e registrou que o juiz Wells observou que o tratamento tinha menos de quarenta por cento de probabilidade de ser eficaz, não era ‘essential’ e era contrário aos desejos do adolescente maduro. Awake!, 22 de maio de 1994Supreme Court of Canada, 26 de junho de 2009

A posição da organização ou explicação posterior: A organização cita decisões desse tipo como reivindicações da consciência e dos direitos das crianças, um enquadramento que tornou explícito no artigo complementar de 1995.

Mostrar as provas (2 fontes)
Publicação primária das Testemunhas de Jeová Verificado

Awake!, “He ‘Remembered His Creator in the Days of His Youth’”

22 de maio de 1994 · pp.6-8 · pars. 29-37 · Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

“For the following reasons, the applications of the Director of Child Welfare are dismissed; the child is not in need of protection; the use of blood or blood products for the purposes of blood transfusion or injection have not been demonstrated to be essential, and in the particular circumstances of this case, could be harmful.”

The article prints extracts from the decision of Wells J of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland, given on Monday 19 July 1993, and states that the decision was later published in the Human Rights Law Journal of 30 September 1993. Further extracts record the judge’s findings that the boy was ‘mature beyond any normal expectation’ and that forcing treatment on him would drastically reduce his suitability for that treatment.

Fonte oficial

Nota de procedência e verificação

Nota de confiança. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and the wording, page marker and paragraph confirmed against the article text.

Corroborado por. src-g-1994-0522-remembered-creator, src-g94d-scc-ac-paras-62-63

Notes. The judgment is reported as Re A.Y. (1993), 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91 (Nfld. S.C.); the Human Rights Law Journal printing cited by the magazine was not opened.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-g94d-yeatts-wells-decision

Registro público oficial Verificado

Supreme Court of Canada, “A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181”

26 de junho de 2009 · pp.[2009] 2 S.C.R. 181 at 221-222 · paras. 62-63 (and para. 128 per McLachlin CJ) · Abella J · Supreme Court of Canada

“In Re L.D.K. (1985), 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164 (Ont. Prov. Ct. (Fam. Div.)), for example, the patient was a 12-year-old girl suffering from acute myeloid leukaemia. … In Re A.Y. (1993), 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91 (Nfld. S.C.), the court was faced with an application from the Director of Child Welfare to impose treatment on a 15-year-old Jehovah’s Witness who had cancer.”

The Supreme Court of Canada’s own summary of the two Canadian decisions described in the 22 May 1994 Awake!. Of Re L.D.K. the Court records that two doctors put the odds of a favourable outcome at around 30 per cent, that Main Prov. Ct. J. found ‘the emotional trauma [the child] would experience’ in forced treatment would outweigh the anticipated benefits (p. 169), and that he concluded ‘[T]his child’s life is equally in danger whichever path is taken’ (p. 170). Of Re A.Y. it records that Wells J noted the treatment was less than 40 per cent likely to be effective, was not ‘essential’, and was contrary to the mature adolescent’s wishes, so that he was not a child in need of protection. At para. 128 the Chief Justice describes the same boy as ‘a 15-year-old boy suffering from terminal cancer’.

Fonte oficial

Nota de procedência e verificação

Nota de confiança. The official Supreme Court of Canada PDF of the judgment was downloaded from decisions.scc-csc.ca (with a Referer header, since the file otherwise returns 403), converted to text with pdftotext and read; paragraphs 62, 63 and 128 were confirmed word for word.

Corroborado por. src-g94d-kosack-judgment, src-g94d-yeatts-wells-decision

Notes. This is the best available confirmation of the citations for the Kosack and Yeatts proceedings. Neither law report was opened directly; CanLII is bot-blocked in this environment.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-g94d-scc-ac-paras-62-63

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-blood-1994-yeatts-court-findings/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.