ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverified2010sExplicit statement

Cronologia e 607 AEC · Claim record

Em uma nota, esse mesmo artigo admite que existem tabuinhas comerciais de todos os anos tradicionalmente atribuídos aos reis neobabilônicos, e que somar esses reinados para trás a partir de Nabonido dá 587 AEC para a destruição de Jerusalém.

Claim ID claim-chronology-business-tablets-concessionConcerns 1 de novembro de 2011Declaração explícita

A afirmação e as suas provas

Declaração explícita · 1 de novembro de 2011 Verificado

Em uma nota, esse mesmo artigo admite que existem tabuinhas comerciais de todos os anos tradicionalmente atribuídos aos reis neobabilônicos, e que somar esses reinados para trás a partir de Nabonido dá 587 AEC para a destruição de Jerusalém. Source: The Watchtower, 1 de novembro de 2011

A posição da organização ou explicação posterior: A nota acrescenta a ressalva da organização: ‘However, this method of dating works only if each king followed the other in the same year, without any breaks in between.’

Mostrar as provas (1 fonte)
Publicação primária das Testemunhas de Jeová Verificado

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two”

1 de novembro de 2011 · p.24 · footnote e · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Business tablets exist for all the years traditionally attributed to the Neo-Babylonian kings. When the years that these kings ruled are totaled and a calculation is made back from the last Neo-Babylonian king, Nabonidus, the date reached for the destruction of Jerusalem is 587 B.C.E. However, this method of dating works only if each king followed the other in the same year, without any breaks in between.”

A footnote attached to the paragraph that dismisses the chronicles and business tablets. It is the organisation’s own statement that the contemporaneous dated documents form a complete year-by-year series for the period.

Nota de procedência e verificação for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two

Nota de confiança. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation was confirmed word for word against the article text.The Watchtower Online Library prints the footnote block at the end of the document, after the last page marker, so the page recorded here is the page carrying the footnote's reference marker in the body text, read from the page marker immediately before it.

Corroborado por. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-business-tablets

Notes. The most significant concession in the series and easy to miss: it concedes that the dated contemporaneous record is continuous, and rests the 20-year gap entirely on the possibility of unattested breaks between reigns.

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-ftn-e

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-chronology-business-tablets-concession/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.