ClaimShunning and familyverified2010sIndependent finding

Ostracismo e família · Claim record

A Comissão Real australiana concluiu, em outubro de 2016, que o ostracismo é 'an inextricable component of the institutional response to child sexual abuse', que a prática 'has the very real potential of putting a survivor in the untenable position' de escolher entre compartilhar uma comunidade com o agressor e perder essa comunidade, que ela 'makes it extremely difficult for a person to leave', e incluiu a política entre as práticas problemáticas da organização; o membro do Corpo Governante Geoffrey Jackson havia declarado que sair pode ser 'personally devastating'.

Claim ID claim-shunning-australia-royal-commission-2016Concerns 1 de outubro de 2016Conclusão independente

A afirmação e as suas provas

Conclusão independente · 1 de outubro de 2016 Verificado

A Comissão Real australiana concluiu, em outubro de 2016, que o ostracismo é 'an inextricable component of the institutional response to child sexual abuse', que a prática 'has the very real potential of putting a survivor in the untenable position' de escolher entre compartilhar uma comunidade com o agressor e perder essa comunidade, que ela 'makes it extremely difficult for a person to leave', e incluiu a política entre as práticas problemáticas da organização; o membro do Corpo Governante Geoffrey Jackson havia declarado que sair pode ser 'personally devastating'. Source: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (Australia), Report of Case Study No. 29: The response of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia Ltd to allegations of child sexual abuse, outubro de 2016

A posição da organização ou explicação posterior: A organização alegou que o ostracismo estava 'outside the Terms of Reference and has no immediate relevance', o que a Comissão rejeitou.

Mostrar as provas (1 fonte)
Registro público oficial Verificado

Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (Australia), Report of Case Study No. 29: The response of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia Ltd to allegations of child sexual abuse, “Section 7.7 Shunning; summary of problematic policies (p. 13)”

outubro de 2016 · pp.13, 70-72 · section 7.7; endnotes 618-636 · Commonwealth of Australia (ISBN 978-1-925289-89-3, CC BY 3.0 AU)

“The Jehovah’s Witness organisation’s practice of shunning members who disassociate from the organisation has the very real potential of putting a survivor in the untenable position of having to choose between constant re-traumatisation at having to share a community with their abuser and losing that entire community altogether.”

Also: 'Even family members are instructed not to associate with a disfellowshipped or disassociated relative unless the association is unavoidable'; 'the practice of shunning is an inextricable component of the institutional response to child sexual abuse'; the organisation's submission that shunning was outside the terms of reference was rejected; Governing Body member Geoffrey Jackson's evidence (14 Aug 2015) that leaving can be 'personally devastating because [a person] can lose their whole social network and their families'; p. 13 lists 'the organisation has a policy and practice of shunning those who wish to leave the organisation' among problematic policies.

Nota de procedência e verificação for Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (Australia), Report of Case Study No. 29: The response of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia Ltd to allegations of child sexual abuse, Section 7.7 Shunning; summary of problematic policies (p. 13)

Nota de confiança. Report PDF (110 pp.) downloaded from the New Zealand inquiry's mirror and text-extracted; wording and page numbers confirmed. Official host (childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au) blocked in this environment.

Procedência da digitalização. Mirror hosted by the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care (New Zealand); Commonwealth of Australia, CC BY 3.0 AU.

Notes. Official PDF (blocked here): https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/file-list/Case%20Study%2029%20-%20Findings%20Report%20-%20Jehovahs%20Witnesses.pdf

Consultado em. 19 de setembro de 2026 · Identificador da fonte. src-rc-au-2016-1000-case-study-29-report

Página da afirmação Corrigir ou atualizar

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/pt-br/evidence/claim-shunning-australia-royal-commission-2016/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.